Home

About us    Mission Statement    ESCOMS     Grievances  

Reforms    History   Tenders    Tariff    Statistics    Policies     Feedback


Policies


IPP Policy          Karnataka Power Reforms


  
 

IPP Policy   -   Need For Review of IPPs and Formulation of a Policy

 

line.gif (80 bytes)

  1. Presently, KPTCL is continuosly facing revenue as well as capital deficits, and finding it difficult to manage its finances and earn a reasonable return. For the year 1999-2000, KPTCL has reported a revenue deficit of Rs.1051 crores. In its ten-year financial plan under "base case with tariff increase of 12% CAGR in first years and 10% CAGR over ten year period", KPTCL has projected a total deficit of Rs 12200 crores to meet the revenue and capital subsides as well as pension commitments
     
  2. Hence, the Government of Karnataka has felt a need for formulation of an IPP policy to be consistent with the financial capabilities of the utilities as well as the Government, able to enable the IPPs to come out with the proposals, which are cost effective, environmentally compliant, and with consistent technology.
     
  3. The Government has also taken note of the fact that the procurement of additional capacities should be based on
    (a) availability at the time of requirement.
    (b) availability at least cost pricing.
    (c) available capacity to be equal to required capacity to avoid deemed generation payments
    (d) location and load specific projects to minimize transmission losses.
      
  4. The high level Committee on Escrow Cover to IPPs constituted by the Government of Karnataka, had recommended to the Government, among other things, as follows:
    (a) The GoK, as owner of KPTCL should not provide escrow cover to any IPP;
    (b) The process of transferring the distribution system to private ownership be completed as soon as possible;
    (c) In order to ensure that the energy supplied is produced at least cost, it is essential to structure contracts to enable the dispatch of generators on a strict merit-order;
    (d) All future development of thermal capacity in Karnataka should be in private sector;
    (e) However, case capacity additional from IPPs are inadequate, then GoK may take steps to strengthen KPCL to meet this requirement in the interim;
    (f) Location-specific and load-specific generation using predominantly renewable fuels must be encouraged.
     
  5. Keeping in the view the above, a Committee to look into the issue of IPPs and make policy recommendations was set up under the Chairmanship of the Principal Secretary to Government, Energy Department. The Committee examined the projections made by KPTCL under Base Case, assuming normal industrial growth rate of 5.29% as well as additional industrial growth anticipated from out of Global Investors' Meet (GIM Scenario). The Committee also took note of the estimated financial deficits amounting to Rs. 12000 crores, upto the FY2010, in the financial projections made by KPTCL, under "moderate tariff increases".
     
  6. For this purpose, energy and demand requirements will have to be worked out carefully atleast for a Ten-year horizon. However considering the past and present trends in consumption by various classes of consumers and also the financial limitations to which KPTCL is exposed, the requirement of additional capacities has been estimated to be 3101 MWs, by the Consultants engaged by KPTCL for thsi purpose.
     
  7. Another exercise has been carried out by a member of the IPP Committee after taking into account
    (a) the low frequency situations
    (b) low voltage condition in many sections of the grid,
    (c) unofficial load shedding during peak hours during summer time,
    (d) absence of adequate spinning reserve.
    (e) Local interruptions due to line or substation constraints or defects in certain sections of the network.
    (f) some of industries reverting back to the grid supply and across the board an increase of 6% per annum, and the additional capacity needed works out to 4358 MW and if an annual growth of 7% is assumed the requirement would go up to 5257 MW. In case the requirement is based on GDP: Power elasticity applicable to the Indian context, the capacity addition will have to be much more.
     
  8. All the above excercises presume that T&D loses will be brought down from the present level of 26% to 14% in the course of ten years, through massive investments.
     

Next >


About us    Mission Statement    ESCOMS     Grievances  

Reforms    History   Tenders    Tariff    Statistics    Policies     Feedback


copyrightŪ 2001-2002   All rights reserved